|
Iterative Method
Summed
1.
Boise St.
2. Oregon
3. TCU
4. Stanford
5. Utah
6. Nebraska
7. Alabama
8. Ohio St.
9. Arizona
10. Oklahoma St.
11. Virginia Tech
12. Missouri
13. Hawaii
14. Auburn
15. Florida St.
16. Pittsburgh
17. Michigan St.
18. Arkansas
19. Oregon St.
20. Illinois
21. Miami (FL)
22. Oklahoma
23. LSU
24. Texas A&M
25. Northern Ill.
|
Iterative Method
Normalized
1. Boise St.
2. TCU
3. Stanford
4. Oregon
5. Nebraska
6. Utah
7. Alabama
8. Arizona
9. Ohio St.
10. Oklahoma St.
11. Missouri
12. Virginia Tech
13. Hawaii
14. Auburn
15. Iowa
16. Florida St.
17. Michigan St.
18. Pittsburgh
19. Oregon St.
20. Arkansas
21. Miami (FL)
22. Illinois
23. LSU
24. Oklahoma
25. Texas A&M
How well were week 10 games predicted?
|
Games
|
Accuracy
|
| All |
|
| Top 70 |
|
Top 70 (Both)
|
|
Top 25
|
|
Top 25 (Both)
|
|
|
Iterative Method
Raw Ranking
1. Boise St.
2. Stanford
3. TCU
4. Oregon
5. Nebraska
6. Utah
7. Alabama
8. Ohio St.
9. Arizona
10. Missouri
11. Virginia Tech
12. Oklahoma St.
13. Hawaii
14. Auburn
15. Iowa
16. Florida St.
17. Michigan St.
18. Oregon St.
19. Pittsburgh
20. Miami (FL)
21. Illinois
22. Arkansa
23. LSU
24. Oklahoma
25. Texas A&M
How well were week 10 games predicted?
|
Games
|
Accuracy
|
| All |
|
| Top 70 |
|
Top 70 (Both)
|
|
Top 25
|
|
Top 25 (Both)
|
|
|
BCS Comp. Rankings
1. Auburn
2. Oregon
3. TCU
4. Missouri
5. Boise St.
6. LSU
6. (TIE) Nebraska
8. Oklahoma
9. Utah
10. Michigan St.
11. Wisconsin
12. Stanford
13. Arizona
13. (TIE) Oklahoma St.
15. Alabama
16. Ohio St.
17. Iowa
18. Mississippi St.
19, Arkansas
20. Baylor
21. South Carolina
22. -
23. Nevada
24. Florida St.
25. North Carolina St.
28. Virginia Tech
www.bcsfootball.org
How well were week 10
games predicted?
|
Games
|
Accuracy
|
| All |
--
|
| Top 70 |
--
|
Top 70 (Both)
|
--
|
Top 25
|
|
Top 25 (Both)
|
|
|
WWR Rankings