|
Iterative Method
Summed
1.
Boise St.
2. Utah
3. Oregon
4. TCU
5. Ohio St.
6. Nebraska
7. Alabama
8. Missouri
9. Virginia Tech
10. Stanford
11. Arizona
12. Oklahoma St.
13. California
14. Florida St.
15. Iowa
16. Nevada
17. Miami (FL)
18. Oklahoma
19. Pittsburgh
20. Hawaii
21. Auburn
22. Michigan St.
23. Georgia
24. South Carolina
25. Illinois
|
Iterative Method
Normalized
1. Boise St.
2. Oregon
3. TCU
4. Utah
5. Nebraska
6. Stanford
7. Arizona
8. Missouri
9. California
10. Florida St.
11. Alabama
12. Oklahoma
13. Miami (FL)
14. Virginia Tech
15. Oklahoma St.
16. Hawaii
17. Iowa
18. Nevada
19. Pittsburgh
20. Michigan St.
21. South Carolina
22. Auburn
23. Oregon St.
24. Ohio St.
25. North Carolina St.
How well were week 9 games predicted?
|
Games
|
Accuracy
|
| All |
68.5%
|
| Top 70 |
72.2%
|
Top 70 (Both)
|
76.5%
|
Top 25
|
83.3%
|
Top 25 (Both)
|
75.0%
|
|
Iterative Method
Raw Ranking
1. Boise St.
2. Oregon
3. TCU
4. Utah
5. Stanford
6. Nebraska
7. Arizona
8. Missouri
9. California
10. Florida St.
11. Alabama
12. Oklahoma
13. Miami (FL)
14. Virginia Tech
15. Oklahoma St.
16. Hawaii
17. Iowa
18. Nevada
19. Pittsburgh
20. Michigan St.
21. South Carolina
22. Auburn
23. Oregon St.
24. Ohio St.
25. North Carolina St.
How well were week 9 games predicted?
|
Games
|
Accuracy
|
| All |
68.5%
|
| Top 70 |
72.2%
|
Top 70 (Both)
|
76.5%
|
Top 25
|
83.3%
|
Top 25 (Both)
|
75.0%
|
|
BCS Comp. Rankings
1. Auburn
2. Missouri
3. Michigan St.
4. TCU
5. Oklahoma
6. (TIE) Boise St.
6. LSU
8. Oregon
9. Wisconsin
10. Utah
11. Ohio St.
12. Alabama
13. Arizona
14. Stanford
15. Nebraska
16. Florida St.
17. Oklahoma St.
18. -
19, Iowa
20. Miami (FL)
21. Arkansas
22. Nevada
23. South Carolina
24. -
25. Baylor
26. Virginia Tech (28)
www.bcsfootball.org
How well were week 9
games predicted?
|
Games
|
Accuracy
|
| All |
--
|
| Top 70 |
--
|
Top 70 (Both)
|
--
|
Top 25
|
77.8%
|
Top 25 (Both)
|
00.0%
|
|
WWR Rankings